Quiet-attentive viewing
toward a typology of collective spectatorship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/cmc.v22i63.3034Keywords:
collective spectatorship, affect, intercorporeality, shared experience, cinemaAbstract
This essay suggests that collectively watching a film with quiet attention should be considered a kind of joint action. When silently watching a film in a cinema the viewers are not merely engaged in individual actions— watching a film with others often implies a shared activity based on a collective intention in which the viewers jointly attend to a single object: the film. Drawing on recent debates about collective intentionality and shared feelings in analytic philosophy and phenomenology, I show that this import of social philosophy can have important ramifications for film theory and history. Proponents of diverse film theoretical approaches like cultural studies, cognitive film theory, film phenomenology or reception aesthetics consider the viewer actively involved with the film. If this is true and the spectators are all active, sitting in the same movie theatre watching the same film in a quiet, attentive way, it seems reasonable to argue that in some important sense they act jointly. My argument will serve as a step towards a more comprehensive theory and phenomenology of collective spectatorship at the movies, an aspect undervalued in the history of film theory.
Downloads
References
BARTHES, R. Leaving the movie theater. In: BARTHES, R. The rustle of language. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. p. 345-349.
BAUDRY, J.-L. Ideological effects of the basic cinematographic apparatus. In: ROSEN, P. (Org.). Narrative, apparatus, ideology. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1986a. p. 281-298.
BAUDRY, J.-L. The apparatus: metapsychological approaches to the impression of reality in the cinema. In: ROSEN, P. (Org.). Narrative, apparatus, ideology. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1986b.
BENJAMIN, W. The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility: second version. In: BENJAMIN, W. Selected writings 1935-1938. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.
BIRÓ, Y. The fullness of minimalism. Rouge, v. 9, 2006.
BUTSCH, R. The making of American audiences: from stage to television, 1750-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
CASETTI, F. Die Explosion des Kinos. Filmische Erfahrung in der post-kinematographischen Epoche. Montage/AV, v. 19, n. 1, p. 11-35, 2010. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/334
CHÂTEAUVERT, J.; GAUDREAULT, A. The noises of spectators, or the spectator as additive to the spectacle. In: ABEL, R.; ALTMAN, R. (Org.). The sounds of early cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.
COCHRANE, T. Joint attention to music. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 49, n. 1, p. 59-73, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn059
ELSAESSER, T. Narrative cinema and audience-oriented aesthetics. In: BENNETT, T. et al. (Org.). Popular television and film. Londres: BFI, 1981. p. 270-282.
ELSAESSER, T. The New New Hollywood: cinema beyond distance and proximity. In: BONDEBJERG, I. (Org.). Moving images, culture and the mind. Luton: University of Luton Press, 2000. p. 187-203.
ELSAESSER, T. Wie der frühe Film zum Erzählkino wurde: vom kollektiven Publikum zum individuellen Zuschauer. In: ELSAESSER, T. Filmgeschichte und frühes Kino: Archäologie eines Medienwandels. Munique: Edition Text + Kritik, 2002. p. 69-93.
GERRIG, R. J.; PRENTICE, D. A. Notes on audience response. In: BORDWELL, D.; CARROLL, N. (Org.). Post-theory: reconstructing film studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996. p. 388-403.
GILBERT, M. Mutual recognition, common knowledge, and joint attention. In: RONNOW-RASMUSSEN, T. et al. (Org.). Hommage à Wlodek: philosophical papers dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz. 2007. Disponível em: www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek. Acesso em: 24 out. 2012.
GILBERT, M. Walking together: a paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, v. 15, 1990.
HANICH, J. Cinematic emotion in horror films and thrillers: the aesthetic paradox of pleasurable fear. Nova York: Routledge, 2010a.
HANICH, J. Collective viewing: the cinema and affective audience interrelations. Passions in Context, v. 1, n. 1, 2010b.
HANICH, J. Watching a film with others: towards a theory of collective spectatorship. Screen, v. 55, n. 3, p. 338-359, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hju026
HANICH, J. The audience effect: on the collective cinema experience. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.
HANSEN, M. Early cinema: whose public sphere? In: ELSAESSER, T. (Org.). Early cinema: space, frame, narrative. Londres: BFI, 1990. p. 228-246.
HANSEN, M. Babel and Babylon: spectatorship in American silent film. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.
KENNEDY, D. The spectator and the spectacle: audiences in modernity and postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
KREBS, A. Dialogical love: analyzing joint action. Library of Living Philosophers’ Volume on Martha Nussbaum, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ethics-etc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/krebs.pdf. Acesso em: 24 out. 2012.
KRIEBICH, A.; GALLAGHER, S. Joint attention in joint action. Philosophical Psychology, 2012.
KUBELKA, P. The invisible cinema. Design Quarterly, n. 93, p. 32-36, 1974. https://doi.org/10.2307/4090908
LINDSAY, V. The art of the moving picture. Nova York: Macmillan, 1915.
MORIN, E. The cinema, or the imaginary man. Mineápolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
O SILÊNCIO DOS INOCENTES. Direção: Jonathan Demme. Produção: Edward Saxon, Kenneth Utt, Ron Bozman. Estados Unidos: Orion Pictures, 1991. 1 DVD (118 min.).
PAGIS, M. Producing intersubjectivity in silence: an ethnographic study on meditation practice. Ethnography, v. 11, n. 2, p. 309-328, 2010.
PANTENBURG, V. Attention, please. Notizen zur Aufmerksamkeitsökonomie in Kino und Museum. Kolik.film, n. 14, 2010.
PANTENBURG, V. 1970 and beyond: experimental cinema and installation art. In: KOCH, G. et al. (Org.). Screen dynamics: mapping the borders of cinema. Viena: Synema, 2012. p. 78-92.
PAUL, W. Laughing screaming: modern Hollywood horror and comedy. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
PERSONA. Direção: Ingmar Bergman. Produção: Ingmar Bergman. Suécia: AB Svensk Filmindustri, 1966. 1 DVD (85 min.).
PSYCHO. Direção: Alfred Hitchcock. Produção: Alfred Hitchcock. Estados Unidos: Paramount Pictures, 1960. 1 DVD (109 min.).
SCHMID, H. B. Wir-Intentionalität: Kritik des ontologischen Individualismus und Rekonstruktion der Gemeinschaft. Freiburg: Alber, 2005.
SCHMID, H. B. Shared feelings: towards a phenomenology of collective affective intentionality. In: SCHMID, H. B. et al. (Org.). Concepts of sharedness: essays on collective intentionality. Heusenstamm: Ontos, 2008. p. 59-86.
SRINIVAS, L. The active audience: spectatorship, social relations and the experience of cinema in India. Media, Culture and Society, v. 24, n. 2, p. 155-173, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400201
TRÖHLER, M. Orte des Spektakels bewegter Bilder. Filmische Dispositive und ihre Atmosphären. In: BRUNNER, P. et al. (Org.). Filmische Atmosphären. Marburg: Schüren, 2012. p. 53-71.
WILLIAMS, L. Discipline and fun: Psycho and postmodern cinema. In: KOLKER, R. (Org.). Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: a casebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. p. 168.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the work sharing with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
